
GMA 립싱크 얘기랑 태도 논란까지 한눈에 정리됐네요. 나도 당황했지만 다음엔 무대 완성도로 깔끔하게 씻어줬으면 하네요.
The "attitude and etiquette" controversy that spread immediately after their appearance on "Good Morning America" in the US. We'll take a chronological look at aespa's image recovery strategy and implementation roadmap, taking a look at the Karina Winter clip and past scandals, and referencing examples of other groups' turnarounds.
table of contents
1. The origin of the controversy: What changed after the first GMA stage performance? 2. The "attitude" framing created by the viral Karina Winter video 3. Summary of issues of fan and public opinion 4. Links between past issues and current impacts 5. Benchmarking: Turning criticism into a growth story 6. Image recovery scenarios that aespa should choose 7. Q&A: Answers to frequently asked questions |
"Good Morning America (GMA)," the flagship US TV show, was the stage to announce aespa's full-scale global expansion. However, contrary to expectations, the absence of live singing, simplistic production, and lack of movement among the members led to criticism that the performance lacked sincerity. The issue wasn't simply lip-syncing, but rather a question of trust: whether the design, refinement, and production were complete enough to warrant a major debut exposure. Subsequently, algorithms on communities and social media extracted and recirculated "points of contention," rapidly solidifying impressions. It appears that the initial missteps affected subsequent content consumption.
A series of isolated scenes, such as Karina's smiling moment immediately after the performance, her slip-up in her acceptance speech at ASEA 2025, Winter's exchange with her staff, and even her Instagram Live (game streaming) immediately after the controversy, were consumed and labeled with the words "frivolous" and "immature." The more a short snippet is reworked, regardless of its original context, the easier it is for the audience to generalize. Attitude controversies are often driven by facial expressions, tone, and momentary reactions. This time, the timing, immediately after a major global exposure, further solidified the framing.
The main points of contention are the "level of stage perfection expected of idols" and "professional behavior in public." Within the fandom, there are mixed opinions, with some questioning the seemingly inadequate preparation of the performance, movement, and coordination, while others point out strategic mistakes in the initial promotion. Non-fans evaluate the group based on "expectations that come with being affiliated with a major agency." Ultimately, both ability and behavior are being tested simultaneously, and simply fixing one aspect is unlikely to turn things around. The entire process, from design to practice to live performances to behavior and communication, requires tuning.
Allegations of plagiarism in their debut music video, the lip-syncing controversy at the university festival, and issues surrounding comments made by individual members have all been resolved, but they have been summoned again on this occasion of GMA, raising questions about whether they are repeating themselves. Regardless of the facts of each individual case or whether an explanation has been given, as the **image stack** that accumulates in the public's memory becomes thicker, even small misunderstandings become more easily amplified. What is needed now is not individual responses, but brand-level improvements.
time | Issues | Key Points | Reaction/impact |
2020 | Debut song MV plagiarism allegations | Similarity of concept and screen |
Initial distrust of the worldview and visuals
|
2021 | Member comments/lip-sync issue | Editing and context debates run parallel |
Criticism spreads mainly overseas
|
2022 | College Festival Lip Sync Attitude | Part-time worker forgetting and traffic flow issues |
Clashing with "event quality" expectations
|
2025.05 | ASEA 2025 comment misspelling | Mispronunciation → Attitude framing |
Accusations of lack of sincerity grow
|
2025.09 | GMA Stage Controversy | No live performances and simple production |
Attitude x Ability Frame is strengthened simultaneously
|
The table above summarizes the flow of issues based on public reports and community discussions.
Groups that received similar criticism turned things around by reorganizing during their hiatus, strengthening their live performances, and improving their stage design. The key isn't an apology or explanation, but showing a change that can be "seen by the ears and eyes" in their next comeback. Creating a sense of stability through key adjustments and redistribution of choruses and ambient music, and minimizing "gaps" by redesigning camerawork, backups, and movement. If consistent improvement is observed over several performances, public opinion will naturally shift to a "hard-working" or "growth story."
Rather than a one-off event, a quarterly (approximately three months) project is appropriate. Below is an example of a workable three-month roadmap.
Phase | period | Implementation plan |
Indicators (check)
|
short-term stabilization | 0-4 weeks | Live arrangement (redistribution of key and breathing points), strengthening of backing chorus/ambient, doubled rehearsal of movement lines, pre-filming of one-take live singing shorts |
Release of MR-removed/AR-minimized clip, pitch and breathing stability (rehearsal measurement), number of reactions and dislike rate for direct recording
|
Restoring trust | 5-8 weeks | Revealing a "comeback showcase"-style live session, announcing full live performances on music shows 1-2 times, and including vocal break songs in the setlist |
The ratio of positive and negative responses immediately after broadcast, the number of days of exposure for live recordings, and the search volume for live-related keywords
|
Elevating the story | 9-12 weeks | Documentary of the training and rebuilding process, collaborative interviews with crew/staff, and a live global Q&A (questions carefully reviewed in advance) |
YouTube average viewer retention rate, improvement of third-party ratings, brand favorability survey
|
At the same time, you need to adjust the tone of your communication. During live streams and behind-the-scenes sessions, prioritize process and responsibility over fun, and refrain from humor or game planning immediately after a dispute. Furthermore, reassigning team members' areas of expertise and clarifying who will take on which key roles will help communicate the team's expertise.
Q1. Is the essence of this case "lip syncing" or "attitude"?
The lip-sync controversy is merely a catalyst. The real issue is the overall perfection of the preparation, direction, movement, and communication. The only way to resolve this is to shift to a live-focused approach and refine the design.
Q2. Are apology letters effective?
There are limits to what can be achieved by a single action. It only becomes meaningful when there is a chain reaction of an apology followed by a visible improvement in the next performance.
Q3. How long does it take to reverse?
Public perception changes quickly after observing two or three consecutive "good stages," but we recommend a quarterly roadmap to ensure sustainability.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
🔥Other interesting articles recommended for you
[2025 Latest] BTS Jimin suddenly marries an ordinary woman!? The truth is revealed!
[Jungkook Taehyung🔞 Novel] BTS Love Love Dream Novel Collection 07