Best TOP 50 Boards
[All] Where is the hospital where the Daejeon obstetrician and gynecologist died? Doctors who performed epidural injections and cesarean sections were fined and reported medical malpractice.
The death of a mother who died after receiving an epidural anesthesia at an obstetrics and gynecology clinic in Daejeon. This comprehensive report covers the questions raised in a post written by the mother's younger sibling, including the cardiac arrest immediately following the epidural anesthesia.
1. What happened in the Daejeon obstetrics and gynecology department death case?
On June 15, 2025, a 29-year-old mother preparing for labor at an obstetrics and gynecology clinic in Daejeon complained of dizziness and shortness of breath approximately 10 minutes after receiving an anesthetic injection, and subsequently went into cardiac arrest. The baby was delivered safely via emergency cesarean section, but the mother never regained consciousness and died on July 7.
2. What questions do families have regarding painless injections?
About a month after the incident, the deceased's younger sibling personally posted on an online community to expose the incident. The author stated that he had received medical advice regarding the possibility that spinal anesthesia, rather than epidural anesthesia, had been administered incorrectly, due to the rapid change in his condition immediately following the procedure. The family suspects this possibility as the cause of death, and shared photographs and expert comments suggesting that "the catheter likely entered the spinal cord, not the dura mater."
3. What were the emergency measures, records, and explanation procedures?
The author also noted that there was no CCTV installed in the operating room at the time of the surgery, and that there were discrepancies between the hospital records and the emergency medical records regarding the emergency treatment. The author also questioned the appropriateness and timing of the endotracheal intubation, as it was performed after the mother's breathing had already weakened.
They also raised issues such as the fact that the hospital did not immediately create medical records immediately after the accident and that there was no sufficient explanation or consent process for the guardian, and stated that accurate fact-finding and system improvement are needed in this regard.
4. What did the original writer say?
The deceased's younger sibling, who wrote the post, stated that "this post is not intended to determine the hospital's responsibility," and that this incident is not simply a tragedy for one family. She emphasized that this case exposed a blind spot in the childbirth system. She also expressed her sorrow at the reality that more people than expected are experiencing the same pain, saying, "I was even more shocked by the fact that so many people have experienced similar things." She also expressed her hope that expectant mothers would be fully informed about painkillers and be able to make informed choices.
5. What was the community response?
After the incident became public, the community expressed condolences for the mother's death, but also expressed concern about the healthcare system, with some asking, "Why is childbirth still so dangerous?" Some experienced mothers expressed vague memories of medical explanations or consent procedures, emphasizing the importance of patients' right to information and pre-delivery procedures. This incident shed light on the opaque structures and institutional blind spots in the healthcare field.
Q&A
Q1. What claim did the author make about the cause of the accident?
A1. They raised the possibility that spinal anesthesia, rather than epidural anesthesia, was administered incorrectly, and stated that they are confirming this possibility through medical advice.
Q2. Was there an explanation and consent procedure at the time of emergency surgery?
A2. The brother-in-law, who is the guardian, said that there was no specific explanation or consent procedure other than the brief statement that “an emergency cesarean section will be performed.”
Q3. What treatment did the mother receive immediately after the accident?
A3. After an emergency cesarean section, he was transferred to a university hospital and was diagnosed with oxygen deprivation and brain damage.
Yes.
Q4. What about hospital records and CCTV?
A4. There was no CCTV installed in the operating room, and there was a question about the difference between the time of writing the medical records and the contents of the emergency records.
It was raised.
Q5. How is the bereaved family currently responding?
A5. We are providing medical and legal advice, and are urging information sharing and institutional improvements to prevent similar cases from recurring.
Check out popular posts in real time
