[All] The problem of celebrities stealing their images through false means is still serious.

Reading the article, I was really shocked... I wonder if there are people who believe this and ask for casting...

I think he was actually an acquaintance of Huh Gak from a long time ago, but we don't even keep in touch anymore.

After putting Huh Gak's name forward, they were promoting him by hosting wedding songs and events...

Moreover, the stars whose images were actually used don't even know the content...

Heo Gak also didn't know the content.......;;

 

Well, it's not like I'm searching the internet every day.

How many issues do celebrities have with their portrait rights?

There seem to be so many people without a conscience.

 

 

Promoting celebrity congratulatory song singing with Huh Gak at the forefront
Singer's side claims "we didn't know" and concerns over portrait rights violations

Group Red Velvet, singer Sung Si-kyung, and Young Tak (from left). Courtesy of their respective agencies and Newsis.

A company has been identified for using the portrait rights of famous singers without permission. The shocking revelations reveal that they misled consumers with phrases like "Guaranteed by Huh Gak" and exploited their trust.
 
If you search for the problematic company name or the keyword "chukga" on a portal site, an advertisement titled "Singer Huh Gak's Top Match" will appear.

Singer Huh Gak. Photo provided by Newsis.

Related search results include celebrity wedding songs, social events, and more. The company's homepage highlights phrases like "We guarantee wedding songs and events with singer Huh Gak" and "We'll send you a list of truly affordable options."

Capture of the event company's homepage.
Banner advertisement for the event company found on a portal site.

When World Biz & Sports World began its investigation, the company's website featured a "Celebrity Congratulatory Songs" section featuring profile photos and names of dozens of singers. The group Red Velvet was the first to catch the eye.
 
While it's not common for a top-tier celebrity singer to sing a congratulatory song, it's not entirely unheard of. They typically attend the weddings of family members or acquaintances and offer their congratulations with a congratulatory song.
 
This company placed Red Velvet's photo at the top of the congratulatory song corner. Is it possible for Red Velvet, who are currently active under different agencies, to receive a casting fee and sing a congratulatory song?
 
When we contacted SM Entertainment, Red Velvet's agency, regarding this matter, the agency responded, "Red Velvet does not send congratulatory songs through companies. The agency also directly coordinates events."
 
When the agency contacted the company to protest, Red Velvet's photos were taken down. The company explained that it was "an error that occurred during the website renewal process."

A list of singers currently on the company's website. Website capture.

The situation was similar for some of the singers listed on the site. The response they received was, "Even if I do attend events, I'll only appear at events for which I've signed a contract through my agency."
 
The reporter contacted the company directly to inquire about pricing. When inquiring about travel expenses for singer Sung Si-kyung, whose face and name are listed on the website's congratulatory song/event section, the company responded, "Sung Si-kyung doesn't sing congratulatory songs." However, the company quickly responded, "He does host events (though he doesn't sing congratulatory songs)." When asked again about the event booking fee, the company responded, "How much are you considering?" Upon hearing this, Sung Si-kyung's agency expressed bewilderment.

Profile photos of Red Velvet, Kim Bum-soo, and Na Yoon-kwon, singers eligible for the congratulatory song, provided on the website before the agency's protest. Screenshot from the website.

Profile photos of famous singers like Sung Si-kyung, Kim Bum-soo, Min Kyung-hoon, and Davichi were deleted. However, the problem is that the photos were removed after protests. There was no compensation for the affected celebrities or an explanation for customers who trusted the photos. Some agencies of celebrities still on the list, such as Song Ga-in and Young Tak, also expressed bewilderment, claiming they were "unknown companies."
 
It appears that the artist's portrait rights were used for a specific business without permission. This raises significant concerns, as the public may perceive this as a strategic partnership with an active artist and his agency.
 
However, Heo Gak, the face of the company, was unaware that his name and photo were being stolen.
 
On the 11th, a representative from Huh Gak's agency expressed anger, saying, "Huh Gak attended many wedding ceremonies, and a childhood friend made him a business proposal. They had collaborated several years ago, but they ended their relationship due to financial issues. They haven't even been in contact."
 
Attorney Lee In-cheol of Lee Law Firm emphasized, "If a celebrity's photo is used for commercial purposes without their consent, they can claim infringement of their portrait rights. Since their name has been misappropriated, this also constitutes infringement of their name rights. They can pursue civil damages for tortious acts." He added, "If their name and photo continue to be used without permission, they can file an injunction demanding the photos be taken down."
 
Regarding this, the company stated, "We received permission to use the photos 4-5 years ago. Some people asked us to list them. However, we have revised the photos for those who recently contacted us to take them down, among those who changed agencies in the meantime." They added, "We wanted to share this information when the event came up. We will call you today to confirm and take action."
 
Regarding the use of Heo Gak's face and name in terms of the company's credibility, he was cautious about his comments after hearing the agency's response.
 
As the demand for celebrity congratulatory songs grows, the event industry is actively promoting its own strengths to attract clients. This process creates a new role for intermediaries. Clients inquire about bookings, and the companies secure the singers and collect a commission.
 
Celebrities and their agencies who are unaware that their portrait rights are being used without permission, as well as the public who trust and request such services, must be vigilant.

0
0
Comments 61
  • Profile Image
    llily036565
    연예인들 허위 정보들 정말 문제가 
    많아요. 
  • Profile Image
    akQuetzal337
    저런 걸로 정작 욕먹는건 연예인일테니 안타깝네요
    무슨 자신감으로 저런 짓을 하는지 모르겠네요
  • Profile Image
    인제이
    문제가 심각하네요 의식개선이 필요하네요
  • Profile Image
    kmjun2202
    고소를 당해도 벌금이 더 약한가여
    어찌 이런 범죄를 자연스럽게 하지
  • Profile Image
    haIguana637
    심각하네요
    개선되어야할것같아요
  • Profile Image
    7cVulture969
    진짜문제입니다 인공지능큰일이에요
  • Profile Image
    mikhaileocampo
    what happend?
  • Profile Image
    준준준준
    되게 사소하게 아무케나 쓰나봐여 
    고소당하면 골치아플텐데여
  • Profile Image
    sunny99lim
    초상권을 무단으로 사용하는 건 명백한 침해예요. 연예인과 팬 모두 피해를 입는 상황이 안타까워요.
  • Profile Image
    항상다니엘편HERE
    아니 맘대로 저래도 되나요?
    법적으로 안될거 같은데요
  • Profile Image
    lpKoala75
    간도크네요 
    유명 연예인들을 허위광고로 쓰다니
  • Profile Image
    둥다
    이미지도용이너무심각한가봐요
    잡을수잇는방법이없나궁금해요
  • Profile Image
    콩야야
    요즘더심각해지는것같아요
    도용도모잘라서합성까지하는것같아요
  • Profile Image
    카프리카
    처벌을재대로하면좋갯내요
    도용이더심해지는것같아요
  • Profile Image
    바오바
    진짜 문제네요. 벌 받길 바래요
  • Profile Image
    ohBlack Bear185
    헐 허각이 최대 피해자네요
    저렇게 해도 되나 고소해야겟어요
  • Profile Image
    hiPangolin924
    허위광고 진짜 심하네요
    무슨 자신감일까요 유명연예인들인데
  • Profile Image
    바람소리
    연예인 이미지 도용이라니 너무 충격이에요. 
    초상권은 기본인데 왜 이렇게 양심 없는 업체가 많을까요?
  • Profile Image
    leCrocodile77
    초상권 침해관련 일들이 많이 일어나고있네요
  • Profile Image
    apple935678
    정말 심각하네요 초상권 침해로 고소해야겠어요