[Photo] Kangmin and Juri dating scandal? Full details of CCTV video and fan reactions

CCTV footage of a man believed to be KISS OF LIFE's Julie and VERIVERY's Kangmin has been circulating on social media, causing a huge stir. We'll take a closer look at the contents of the video, the reaction of fans and the public, the agency's response, the truth of the matter, and future implications.

table of contents

1. Overview of the incident: How the video was released

2. Content of the video and the core of the controversy

3. Fandom Reactions and Social Repercussions

4. Response from the agency

5. Authenticity and the Possibility of AI Synthesis

6. Future Outlook and Impact

7. Key points of the debate as seen in the Q&A

1. Overview of the incident: How the video was released

The current controversy began with a video uploaded to the Chinese social media platform Weibo on September 28, 2025. The video shows a man and woman spending time together in what appears to be a private room at an izakaya, and is recorded as having been filmed on May 7, 2025. It is believed to have been filmed on CCTV, but the source of the leak is unknown. The video then quickly spread across social media platforms around the world, including "X," and attracted a great deal of attention.

2. Content of the video and the core of the controversy

The video shows the man stroking the woman's hair and hugging her from behind as she tries to leave. The woman can also be seen smoking an e-cigarette inside the stall. While the video quality is poor, the man's face is unclear, but many have said that the woman's face is relatively clear and recognizable, sparking widespread speculation online that she may be Julie from Kiss of Life and Kangmin from Verivery.

3. Fandom Reactions and Social Repercussions

As the video spread, fans became increasingly angry. Fans claimed that "extremely private footage was illegally leaked," and demanded strong action from the agency. In particular, there are concerns that the fact that the names of the individuals involved were mentioned before the truth of the matter is known could significantly damage their image and reputation.

Fan reaction	Details
Privacy violation	They claim that illegal filming and leaking is a crime in itself, and spreading it is a secondary offense.
Legal action request	Calls for the identification and criminal punishment of those who filmed and spread the images
Concerns about image damage	It is dangerous to spread real names when the truth is still unclear
Protection request	The argument that agencies should protect their artists and fans

4. Response from the agency

Neither agency has made any official comments to date. According to an industry insider, "We are aware that the video has been spreading, but it is difficult to confirm its authenticity." This shows that the agencies are taking a cautious stance.

5. Authenticity and the Possibility of AI Synthesis

The focus of the debate is whether the footage is genuine. Due to the poor image quality and some unnatural scenes, it has been suggested that it may be a synthetic image created using AI. In recent years, advances in AI technology have made it difficult to distinguish between real and fake footage, so expert verification is required.

6. Future Outlook and Impact

If the video is genuine, it could have a serious impact on the image and activities of the person involved. On the other hand, if it is found to be a fake, such as an AI synthesis, severe punishment will be inevitable for the person who spread it, for the defamation suffered by the artist due to false information.

Furthermore, this incident is not just an entertainment scandal; it could serve as an opportunity to highlight social issues such as privacy protection, illegal filming and distribution, and regulations on AI synthesis.

7. Key points of the debate as seen in the Q&A

Q1. Are the people in the video really Julie and Kangmin?
A. The woman's face is relatively clear, but the man's is blurry and it is difficult to say for sure.

Q2. When and where was the footage filmed?
A. The CCTV recording shows the date as May 7, 2025, and it is believed to have been taken in what appears to be a private room in an izakaya.

Q3. What is the official position of your agency?
A. They have only commented that they are aware of the spread of the information, but that it is difficult to verify its authenticity, and have not provided a clear position.

Q4. What are the possibilities for AI-synthesized images?
A. Some experts and fans have raised the possibility of AI-based counterfeiting. It is difficult to distinguish between these two types of counterfeits with modern technology, so detailed verification is required.

Q5. What do your fans want?
A. We are calling for the arrest and strict legal action of those who are illegally filming and distributing the photos, and for the agency to protect the artists.

👉 This incident goes beyond a simple idol controversy and once again highlights the seriousness of privacy protection and the spread of illegal videos in the digital age.

🔥Other interesting articles recommended for you

[Photo] Voicepla 2 Sangwon from before plastic surgery to now... is it true that his face has changed too much?

[Voicepla 2 Rankings] Will Lee Sang-won continue his lead? What are the real variables in the final TOP24 results?

[2025 Latest] Who is Girls' Generation's Yoona's Love Partner? A thorough explanation of her 8 past boyfriends and the possibility of marriage!

[2025 Latest] Is V and Jennie's relationship true? A complete summary of the evidence of their relationship and the whole process leading up to their breakup!

[2025 Latest] BTS Jimin suddenly marries an ordinary woman!? The truth is revealed!

[Jungkook Taehyung🔞 Novel] BTS Love Love Dream Novel Collection 07