[All] Park Na-rae's ex-boyfriend's identity revealed: Who is he? Ex-boyfriend, employee, business administration major, controversy, 300 million won
The controversy surrounding Park Na-rae's ex-boyfriend is spreading beyond her personal life to issues related to corporate operations and fund management.
We summarize the current issues, including the claim of a business administration graduate, employee salaries of 4 million won, 300 million won in deposits, and the dispute over the agreement.
1. Why did the controversy surrounding Park Na-rae's ex-boyfriend erupt?
This controversy didn't start with a romantic relationship.
The key is whether your ex-boyfriend was an employee of the company.
And it started with the question of whether the salary, loan, and deposit funds were executed according to corporate procedures.
especially
- Monthly salary of approximately 4 million won
- Claim for a cumulative payment of 44 million won
- 300 million won in deposit
- Mention of a 10 billion loan included in some claims
As such specific numbers emerged, the controversy spread rapidly.
2. What role did Park Na-rae reveal about her ex-boyfriend?
In a media interview, Park Na-rae described her ex-boyfriend as follows:
I was a company employee, and the accounting team was only responsible for tax-related work, while my ex-boyfriend was in charge of bookkeeping, contract review, and practical accounting.
He was involved in the initial work of broadcast appearance contracts and the establishment of the company.
In other words, the position is that the salary was paid in exchange for performing work, not for personal relationships.
3. Key Issues in the "Business Administration Graduate" Controversy
The former manager's side refuted the claim, saying, "Contrary to the explanation that he majored in business administration, I understand that he dropped out after only one semester."
However, the core of this debate is not academic qualifications themselves.
Legally important criteria include whether actual work is performed, whether an employment contract exists, and the approval authority and instruction system.
Existence of outputs such as contracts and ledgers.
Some point out that as the debate over academic background grows, the essence becomes more blurred.
4. What's the problem with mentioning loans of 300 million won and 1 billion won for a deposit?
Park Na-rae is in charge of the 300 million won in rental deposit, including the form of employee rental deposit loan, prior confirmation by the accounting team, collateral setting, and interest payment.
He explained that everything was handled according to procedure.
On the other hand, the controversy grew as the expression "10 billion loan" was mentioned during some of the claims.
However, the criterion for judgment is not the size of the amount,
The name of the fund execution, internal approval process, repayment structure and supporting documents.
Numbers raise doubts, but the conclusions are drawn through procedures.
5. Why did the dispute over the agreement escalate?
Park Na-rae said about the agreement
“There was a demand to admit false facts and a clause to pay 30 million won per statement,” he claimed.
On the other hand, the former manager's side had a compensation structure of 30 million won each in case of mutual violation.
Rather, Park Na-rae countered that there was a 1 billion won compensation clause in the agreement.
Ultimately, the key is whether the actual agreement will be made public and how the text is interpreted.
FAQ
Q1. Was Park Na-rae's ex-boyfriend actually an employee?
A. Park Na-rae claimed to be an employee, and whether she actually performed her duties will be determined by her contract and work records.
Q2. Is a monthly salary of 4 million won excessive?
A. The scope of work and contract structure are more important than the amount itself.
Q3. Is a 300 million won deposit illegal?
A. Employee rental deposit loans are possible, but the process, collateral, and repayment structure are key.
Q4. How will the agreement controversy be resolved?
A. It is highly likely that this will be resolved through the disclosure of the original text of the agreement and legal judgment.