Best TOP 50 Boards
[All] Son Heung-min's girlfriend Yang Min-hee's face revealed? A comprehensive summary of her Instagram, pregnancy threats, and more!
Shocking! Yang Min-hee's face photo suddenly revealed: from the controversy to the truth behind Son Heung-min's pregnancy threat, we'll give you a thorough rundown of her Instagram information and the timeline of events!
table of contents 1. Why was Yang Min-hee's face photo made public? 2. Yang Min-hee's identity and Instagram summary 3. Pregnancy blackmail case timeline 4. Human rights violation controversy and public reaction 5. Conclusions and Implications |
1. Why was Yang Min-hee's face photo made public?
On May 17, 2025, Yang Min-hee's face was captured on media cameras while she was appearing at the warrant review at the Seoul Central District Court, causing an immediate controversy. Normally, suspects' faces are hidden as much as possible, but on this day, the police prevented her from trying to cover her face with documents, and as a result, her face was fully revealed. In particular, in contrast to Mr. B, a man in his 40s who was pointed out as a public offender, who was hiding his face with a mask and hat, harsh criticism of "lack of fairness" spread across the community and on social media.
2. Yang Min-hee's identity and Instagram summary
Yang Min-hee was born in 2001 and previously worked as a model. Shortly after the news was released, her Instagram account was either set to private or deleted, and numerous fake accounts and photos have been circulating online, raising concerns about secondary victimization. Some testimonies claim that her official profile photo from her modeling days closely resembles a photo of her in court, but official identity verification remains incomplete. Therefore, until an official announcement is made, people should refrain from recklessly revealing her identity or spreading unverified information.
3. Pregnancy blackmail case timeline
June 2024: Yang sent an ultrasound photo to Son Heung-min and began threatening to "publicize her pregnancy"
▪️Mid-2024: Son's side signs a settlement agreement and pays 300 million won to settle the matter.
▪️March 2025: Accomplice B joined and extorted money again, demanding an additional 70 million won.
▪️Early May 2025: Son files formal complaint with Gangnam Police Station on charges of blackmail and attempted blackmail.
▪️Mid-May 2025: Both Yang and B were arrested, and their photographs were published during their court appearance for a warrant review, inciting public opinion.
▪️ Latest investigation: Police records confirm that Yang did in fact undergo an abortion after becoming pregnant, proving that the ultrasound photos were not fabricated, and the inconsistencies in testimony have once again sparked debate.
4. Human rights violation controversy and public reaction
In the early stages of the incident, many people called it a clear case of blackmail targeting a celebrity, but at the same time, a controversy broke out over the human rights violations caused by revealing the suspect's face.
Those in favor: "It was an unavoidable measure, as the suspect himself did not request that his face be concealed and it was not intentionally made public."
Opponents: "The privacy and human rights of suspects have been disregarded" and "The principle of the presumption of innocence has been undermined"
The police explained that "suspects in custody are free to choose what they wear" and that "they are not obligated to provide hats or masks," but there are continuing voices in the media and online that say "the police have failed to take appropriate protective measures."
5. Conclusions and Implications
This case highlights the seriousness of financial extortion crimes against celebrities, as well as the risk of suspects' identities being made public.
Thorough legal procedures: In order to protect the rights of both suspects and victims, it is urgent to establish objective standards in the investigation and trial processes.
Compliance with journalistic ethics: Careful reporting is required to avoid unconfirmed information and excessive identities, and to prevent secondary damage.
Community responsibility: Online users are also expected to base discussions on “verified information” and build a healthy culture of criticism.
What do you think about this issue? Let us know in the comments!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
🔥Other interesting articles recommended for you
Author ywVervetMonkey995
Post ソン・フンミンの彼女、ヤン・ミンヒの顔が公開?彼女のインスタ、妊娠脅迫などを徹底総まとめ!
- Cursing or hateful contents
- Sexual contents
- Spam or repetitive posting
- Violation of privacy policy
- Slandering of someone in particular
- Others
False reporting may result in
service restrictions.